English Spanish Translator Org: Translation Forum � Translators Forums - View Single Post

gentle · 12-01-2007, 06:09 AM

There are two different ways. The more literal one is "soy s�lo un conductor" "Estoy aqu� s�lo para entregar este mensaje". Watch out that "s�lo" needs an accent as it is replacing "solamente" (as an adverb and not an adjective).
The other way that is not literal at all would be: "No soy m�s que un conductor". "No estoy aqu� m�s que para entregar este mensaje".
Hope this helps!

12-01-2007, 06:09 AM	#2
gentle Contributing User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 112 Rep Power: 122	Soy solo un... There are two different ways. The more literal one is "soy s�lo un conductor" "Estoy aqu� s�lo para entregar este mensaje". Watch out that "s�lo" needs an accent as it is replacing "solamente" (as an adverb and not an adjective). The other way that is not literal at all would be: "No soy m�s que un conductor". "No estoy aqu� m�s que para entregar este mensaje". Hope this helps!